Performance Evaluations
Before I begin testing any woofer, I put it through a break-in or exercise period. I usually apply a 20Hz sine wave signal to the woofer at a level of about 25% of rated power, for a period of about 4 hours, with the woofer in a free air state. This process allows the mechanical elements of the drivers suspension to loosen up and normalize. After break-in, the woofer is allowed to cool for at least 4 hours before doing any further testing. In the case of the Stealth 13, I let it sit overnight, and then made all of the small signal parameter measurements first thing the following morning. As the owners manual made very clear, the specifications make the woofer ideally suited to sealed enclosures only鈥 don鈥檛 even bother trying to come up with a vented design. Yes, port heads鈥 I鈥檓 talking to you! Don鈥檛 do it!
Once those were completed, I mounted it in the optimum recommended enclosure, a 0.75 cubic foot sealed box, and took it into my listening room. With the woofer connected to my reference system, and the low pass crossover adjusted to about 80Hz, I began to evaluate the sound and power handling of the Stealth 13. Because I have tested quite a few of these shallow designs, and because of the very reasonable price of the Soundstream woofer, I had relatively low expectations. I have become used to accepting some performance tradeoffs for the convenience of a shallow woofer, but the Stealth 13 has raised the bar for what I expect from a moderately priced shallow woofer. As usual, I ran the gamut of musical genres during the evaluation, and the Stealth 13 couldn鈥檛 have cared less whether I played Bach or ZZ Top. The sound from the woofer was much better than I was expecting, with pretty decent low extension and nice warm 鈥渞ound鈥 sounding bass. Definition and clarity were good as well, plucked strings and acoustic bass were well reproduced and sounded quite natural, with only a tiny bit of ringing or boominess, which many people seem to prefer anyway. As is always the case, lower F3 and improved damping can be had with a larger enclosure, but you trade off output and power handling, which is never a good thing in a car. I鈥檇 trust the Soundstream recommendations on this one, unless you are very experienced with custom enclosure design. To test the woofers ability to handle power mechanically, I deliberately picked a couple of fairly abusive 鈥淏ass Mekanik鈥 tracks, and applied well over the rated 200 watts of power. Not until I got to over 400 watts did the woofer even show any sign of stress, so if you use it as rated, it should be as reliable as a stone.
One of the best ways of summing up the performance of this woofer was a comment from a friend who happened to drop in during my listening. He said, 鈥淲ow, that鈥檚 pretty impressive bass from a single woofer in such a small box.鈥 Even more impressive鈥 at the time, he had no idea the woofer was only 2鈥 deep, and thought it was a conventional design.
听
On the bench the Soundstream Stealth 13 measured about the way it sounded鈥 which was quite good! The graphs of the performance measurements and electro mechanical parameters are listed below. My measurements were quite close to the published specs, which is another good indication of a properly developed product.
听
Conclusion听
If you have an application for a very shallow woofer and a relatively small enclosure limitation, you鈥檇 be seriously amiss not to have a close look at this woofer. Yes, there are better performing woofers, for either more money, or for larger boxes, but there aren鈥檛 very many that will outperform the Stealth 13 for the same money in a small sealed box. I鈥檇 love to hear a pair of these in a standard cab pickup鈥 Boom Yeah!听
Electro Mechanical Parameters
LMS 鈥 Loudspeaker Measurement System
Method= Double Curve - Delta Mass
Revc = 3.600 Ohm
Fo = 32.043 Hz
Sd = 80.470 In虏
Vas = 1.446 Ft鲁
Cms = 106.974u M/N
Mmd = 223.814 g
Mms = 230.616m Kg
BL = 10.552 T路M
Qms = 3.030
Qes = 1.501
Qts = 1.004
Levc = 539.078u H
No = 0.087 %
SPLo = 81.402 dB
EPB = 21.34
听
听
听
听